(disclosure: I shoot film essentially exclusively. I think it's pretty awesome.)
I think the whole "Digital vs. Film" question is a canard. Or possibly a red herring. Or even a dead horse. Certainly some sort of animal metaphor is appropriate.
In the decade this debate has been going on, I have never seen a decent answer to the question that didn't boil down to "each has pros and cons, it boils down to what you like more."
In the community sense, my experience on film forums and groups gives me the strong feeling that if there's an obviously hostile film/digital atmosphere, there won't ever be a significant group of knowledgeable film users, and I feel that would be significant loss.
I suppose it's a double-edge question: which of the existing questions do people feel have merit?